SGV NEWS FIRST: ARMED WITH A TASER. Legally or illegally?

[S.SaulGood]

California state law permits the carry and use of devices that fall under the general category of "Stun Guns":

Stun Gun Laws in California

It makes clear certain restrictions:

Who Can and Can't Carry a Stun Gun in California?
Compared to some other states, California has few restrictions on consumer use of stun guns or Tasers. The state allows anyone to buy, possess, or use a stun gun (without a permit requirement):

**unless they have been convicted of a felony or assault** being one of those restrictions

 

[S.SaulGood]

And THIS is a first amendment audit? Trading profanities with elderly, mentally challenged white women? Threatening to have them put away? And threatening young mothers and 2 year olds with child protective services? Much to the utter delight of his adoring fans? Tubby is there to "spread awareness of the first amendment"?

This is harassment. This has NOTHING to do with first amendment auditing and everything to do with hatred for whites and overstepping one's authority.


I'm surprised that Tubby didn't Taze the baby or at least mace him right in the face. Close range. Square in the eyes. Try to blind him for life. Or the mother. Or both. I was half expecting it. On other videos of his, adoring fans have commented that he should mace children sitting in the back seat of a car. Seems like they expect it and would welcome it. Others have commented that he should go back to a kennel and throw rat poison over the fence onto the grounds. And on the one above, there's a comment to the effect that on Sunday, one of Tubby's followers is going to "get CCDums and kill his dog".
Nice, huh? "Father Jose". The good Friar Jose. The Johnny Appleseed of love, spreading love, peace, and coming together, as he professes instead of the seeds of hatred he sows.

When you can SAY anything you want to people without repercussion, consider them less than human, it's only a matter of time before you believe you can DO anything you please to your intended favorite targets, in Tubby's case, babies, children, women and elderly. These make up WELL over 50% of Tubby's 1st amendment torment video victims.

Even hardcore killers typically honor a code. No women. No kids. But those would be men.

And again; Usually churches and sometimes a synagogue, but NEVER a Mosque. Gee, I can't figure that one out! ROFL.

 

[S.SaulGood]

And it may be prudent to warn California Citizen's Watch that one of Tubby's followers is stating his intention to "get him and kill his dog on Sunday", in no uncertain terms, an unqualified threat.

No "if you do this, I'll do that". That's not a conditional threat. He's simply stating his precise intention. There's no misinterpreting it. A death threat. The kind of threat that should always be taken seriously. Especially given the nature of the reprobates that support Tubby, his midget, and his "Queen", God help the three of them if THAT'S their Queen.