Search results

  1. R

    Posting Criminal Histories? What's the Point?

    To the Curators, What's the point of posting so many auditor criminal histories? Do you somehow believe that people with criminal histories, no matter how minor or not, have forfeited all of their First Amendment rights? It would be better journalism, at least, to get some background info on...
  2. R

    Both sides of the coin with James Freeman

    Are you trying to mislead or do you really not know the history of this situation? Did you see the earlier part where the irate guy drove up, confronted James, and threatened him? That was way before this video was taken.
  3. R

    Battousai Wins Case Law (Turner v Driver)

    Especially when he doesn't realize he lost.
  4. R

    HATETHESTATE / SO THEY CALL IT FREEDOM

    Not biased, huh? And he didn't dox a janitor. He doxed a guy that was calling him on the phone and making death threats. That guy was a security guard -- totally different from the janitor issue.
  5. R

    You Will be Assimilated. Resistance is Futile. Or not!: United States v. Waites

    The 9th Circuit ruled that the Oregon trespass law, or any trespass law in the 9th Circuit for that matter, cannot be assimilated because it seeks to punish substantially the same act or omission as does the Federal Postal law.
  6. R

    You Will be Assimilated. Resistance is Futile. Or not!: United States v. Waites

    No they didn't. And read Poster 7. There is nothing about trespassing in there.
  7. R

    Furry Potato Shooting – Guard Charge Evaluation Sheet

    And which statute is that? I'm not aware of any statutes that restrict someone from filming on a public sidewalk, except maybe the California Penal code 626.8, which does not apply to constitutionally-protected rights of speech and assembly.
  8. R

    Turner v Driver 2017-02-27

    Sorry, I had the wrong case for the statement I made above. I'm going to have to find the case again. Here is a quote from Adderley, though, that hints at what I'm talking about. "The Edwards case, like this one, did come up when a number of persons demonstrated on public property against...
  9. R

    News Now Patrick's Motion to Dismiss / Response from State

    My point is that they are using cases that they claim have a fact pattern and statutory language similar to Patrick's case. However, the simple fact that those other states require the person stopped to identify, and then applied the delaying an officer statute when the person did not identify...
  10. R

    Furry Potato Shooting – Guard Charge Evaluation Sheet

    That code section does not apply to constitutionally-protected rights. (e) This section shall not be utilized to impinge upon the lawful exercise of constitutionally protected rights of speech or assembly.
  11. R

    Furry Potato Shooting – Guard Charge Evaluation Sheet

    Time, Place, and Manner is not for deciding if an expressive activity is protected under the First Amendment. It's the opposite. It's for the courts to decide whether the government's restrictions withstand scrutiny.
  12. R

    Furry Potato Shooting – Guard Charge Evaluation Sheet

    "We have decided that your First Amendment rights make us feel uncomfortable. Therefore, your rights are hereby revoked. Thank you for your cooperation."
  13. R

    News Now Patrick's Motion to Dismiss / Response from State

    It's funny how the District Attorney's Response to Patrick's motion goes into great detail about how he is required to ID, but the cases it cites are from Georgia and Nevada, two Stop and ID states. Oklahoma is not a stop and ID state, however. They are so desperate to convict him that they have...
  14. R

    You Will be Assimilated. Resistance is Futile. Or not!: United States v. Waites

    "Even if California state trespass law, as was Oregon state trespass law, is precluded from assimilation and use to prosecute trespass on postal property, trespassers could still be prosecuted under federal regulation" But there is no federal regulation against trespassing in the public areas...
  15. R

    Turner v Driver 2017-02-27

    It sort of says that, but more accurately, it says that expressive conduct can only be banned if it is fundamentally incompatible with the purpose for which the place was dedicated. In Adderley, it was a jailhouse, and it was determined that protesting was fundamentally incompatible. Other...
View older results

Members online

No members online now.
Total: 93 (members: 1, guests: 92)

Forum statistics

Threads
3,575
Messages
7,346
Members
687
Latest member
Donaldecodo

New Threads

Top